On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 08:25:58AM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Priority # Change from last report
> > -------- --- -----------------------
> > P1 4 - 3
> > P2 80 + 10
> > P3 9 +- 0
> > P4 84 + 4
> > P5 35 - 1
> > -------- --- -----------------------
> > Total P1-P3 93 + 7
> > Total 212 + 10
>
> These numbers are higher than the corresponding numbers for GCC 5.0.1
> you shared at the same when intuitively I would have expected them to
> match.
>
> I _know_ it must be something obvious. What is that?
Some bugs during the GCC 5 bugfixing were just retargetted to 6.0 milestone
only, e.g. if they have been somehow worked around for GCC 5 and need a
better fix for GCC 6, or if we've realized we are not going to fix them in
GCC 5 and defer the fix to GCC 6, etc.
Jakub
