On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:09:05 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:31:45 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > What is the recommended fix? I expect pointer to a declaration / opaque > > type > > which gets completed only when one references the 'p' field later? > > It looks as it got fixed by:
It did not.
As I was told the mail was unclear - to simplify the question:
How to get 'volatile struct sv' GCC 'tree' type for:
volatile struct sv { volatile struct sv *p; };
Thanks,
Jan
