On 5 June 2015 at 16:55, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > The GCC manual says "GCC does not use the latitude given in C99 and C11 > only to treat certain aspects of signed '<<' as undefined, but this is > subject to change". It would certainly be nice if they removed the > "this is subject to change" part.
Does clang provide a similar guarantee? I couldn't find one in a quick scan through the docs, but I might be looking in the wrong place. thanks -- PMM
