On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Vladimir Makarov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Actually it raise a question for me. If we describe that a function
> clobbers more than calling convention and then use it as a value (assigning
> a variable or passing as an argument) and loosing a track of it and than
> call it. How can RA know what the call clobbers actually. So for the
> function with the attributes we should prohibit use it as a value or make
> the attributes as a part of the function type, or at least say it is unsafe.
I think it should be part of the type. This shouldn't compile:
void func(void) __attribute__((used_reg("r12")));
void (*x)(void);
x = func;
--Andy
