On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 07:59:50AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:01:48AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > >> To summarize: there is currently no testcase for a wrong-code issue > >> because there is no wrong-code issue.
I've added a testcase at https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19965#c3 that shows the address problem (&x != x) with older gcc *or* older glibc, and shows the program behaviour problem with current binutils+gcc+glibc. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM
