Hello. I've been working on use-after-scope sanitizer enablement in the GCC compiler ([1]) and as I've read following submit request ([2]), the LLVM compiler started to utilize following option: -mllvm -asan-use-after-scope=1
My initial attempt was to introduce a new option value for -fsanitize option (which would make both LLVM and GCC option compatible). Following the current behavior of the LLVM, I would have to add a new --param which would lead to a divergence. Is the suggested approach alterable for LLVM community? I would also suggest following default behavior: - If -fsanitize=address or -fsanitize=kernel-address is enabled, the use-after-scope sanitization should be enabled - Similarly, providing -fuse-after-scope should enable address sanitization (either use-space or kernel-space) Thank you for feedback, Martin [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg00468.html [2] http://reviews.llvm.org/D19347