On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:00:16AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote: > Also I think the other place where we should accept basic asm is for > "nop" instructions. I have seen people use that heavily.
And anything else that means the same as basic asm and as extended asm. > Note really I don't like the idea of deprecating basic asm at all. If basic asm is deprecated, that means some time later it will be removed, at which time an asm without : can be used as extended asm (or we can force everyone to write asm("nop":); if we are silly). Warning about asm without : now is just unnecessary churn (and not just for us, also for all the users of inline asm). Segher