On 11 July 2016 at 13:53, Mikhail Maltsev <malts...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 07/10/2016 08:15 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: >> Moving all gnutools to a single git/svn repository that can still be >> built piece-wise would help sharing gnulib and other useful libraries. >> If LLVM can do it, there is no reason why gnutools can't. And they >> have shown that it helps code reuse and modular design. All the manual >> syncing between gnu projects is a waste of time. > > But LLVM does not keep everything in a single repository. In fact, it's quite > the opposite: they have a separate repo for Clang (the frontend, ~ gcc/c, cp, > ...), for compiler-rt (~ libgcc), for libc++ (~ libstdc++). > > All utilities (~ libiberty) live in the LLVM repo (include/llvm/ADT, > include/llvm/Support, lib/Support). Other projects, like LLDB, are checked out > into a subdirectory, and are always built from the combined tree.
I stand corrected. It has been a while since I built the whole LLVM toolchain and I was misremembering the details. Thanks, Manuel.
