On 27 March 2017 at 14:26, Steve Kargl wrote: > I completely disagree with your viewpoint here. If someone turns > on a silly warning, that someone should fix all places within the > tree that triggers that warning. There is ZERO value to this warning, > but added work for others to clean up that someone's mess.
Your absolutist view is just an opinion and reasonable people disagree on the value of the warning. It's already found bugs in real code. You could continue being upset, or somebody who understands the code could just fix the warnings and everybody can get on with their lives.
