On 04/03/2018 07:05 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
@@ -3914,6 +3916,7 @@ Options} and @ref{Objective-C and Objective-C++ Di
-Wc++11-compat -Wc++14-compat @gol
-Wcatch-value @r{(C++ and Objective-C++ only)} @gol
-Wchar-subscripts @gol
+-Wclass-memaccess @r{(C++ and Objective-C++ only)} @gol
-Wcomment @gol
-Wduplicate-decl-specifier @r{(C and Objective-C only)} @gol
-Wenum-compare @r{(in C/ObjC; this is on by default in C++)} @gol
The verbose '(C++ and Objective-C++ only)' and similar repeated
annotations are annoying. Even in the diff snippet there's no
consistency -- Why is -Wc++11-compat not annotated, why does
enum-compare contain what looks like documentation; 'on by default ...'.
Either don't note at this point, or use some contraction such as simply
'(C)' or '(C++)' with the understanding that unless otherwise specified
that includes the objective dialect.
Is it possible to use two different footnote markers such as
<super>{C,C++}</super> and explain in the so-noted footnote?
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell
