On 4/3/19, Martin Jambor <mjam...@suse.cz> wrote: > Hello Joshi, > > On Mon, Apr 01 2019, sameeran joshi wrote: >> HI, >> Discussing the project with Andi, I have drafted a proposal, please >> review and suggest >> necessary changes. >> If some OpenMP experts from GCC have some ideas or changes please >> suggest. >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1axElw-I5pTwcjI4iMle5NhLeRCcshIjH5ZHm3GGwsZU/edit?usp=sharing > > I will leave most of the evaluation on Andi (and assume he likes the > proposal, by the way). However, I have read the proposal, I like it and > I consider it very useful but also possibly quite ambitious. But we can > adjust expectations as we go forward. > > Please consider fixing some of the formatting in the document, > especially of the code snippets, sometimes they are a bit difficult to
Thanks for pointing it, I have indented them. > read without any indentation. That may be also the reason why I don't > quite understand what is the relationship of omp tasks and loops or > uninitialized local arrays. I have removed the location to insert for OMP tasks at 'uninitialized local array initialization'. Only kept it for as it was getting more complex. 1. while loops 2. nested for loops If you could suggest which constructs do you feel more ambitious?, so I could work on it to modify them. > > But apart from that it is nice, thanks for applying, Thanks, Sameeran Joshi > > Martin >
