Am 29.04.2019 um 09:59 schrieb Johannes Pfau: > Am 25.04.19 um 20:05 schrieb Rainer Emrich: >> Does anybody knows what's the plans for D on mingw. >> >> AFAIS the frontend builds and is enabled for mingw. But the D runtime is >> disabled for mingw and doesn't build. >> >> A quick dive into the source showed that there is code for mingw target. >> But it looks like the wrong configuration is selected. >> >> Any ideas? > > it is correct that there are a few leftovers of previous MinGW support > in druntime. That code is quite old: Back then upstream did only support > the custom Digitalmars 32bit C library on Windows and MinGW was the only > compiler targeting the msvcrt runtime. Then at some point upstream added > support for msvcrt (CRuntime_Microsoft versioned code) but also broke > MinGW code. We therefore did not push the MinGW config code when merging > into GCC, as we knew MinGW was broken anyway. > > I've did some work on fixing MinGW, but progress there has been delayed > by proper emutls support (integration of GCC emutls with the D garbage > collector). Without such GC support, most things would seem to work, but > you get random crashes once the GC starts to collect live data. We > actually never had proper emutls GC support in MinGW/GDC (I think > someone had patches to implement native TLS in GCC and binutils though). > > As we pushed emutls GC support a few days ago, I now revived my > work-in-progress MinGW changes here: > https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/gcc/pull/14 That's really nice.
> > This likely won't make it into GCC 9.1 anymore though, so it's probably > up for 9.2. Yeah, I think it won't make it into 9.1, but I may test on the gcc-9 branch. That's fine for me. Thanks for your work Rainer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature