On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 4:04 PM Ramana Radhakrishnan < ramana....@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 11:03 AM Akshat Garg <xks...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > As we have some working front-end code for _Dependent_ptr, What should > we do next? What I understand, we can start adding the library for > dependent_ptr and its functions for C corresponding to the ones we created > as C++ template library. Then, after that, we can move on to generating the > assembly code part. > > > > > I think the next step is figuring out how to model the Dependent > pointer information in the IR and figuring out what optimizations to > allow or not with that information. At this point , I suspect we need > a plan on record and have the conversation upstream on the lists. > > I think we need to put down a plan on record. > > Ramana [CCing gcc mailing list] So, shall I start looking over the pointer optimizations only and see what information we may be needed on the same examples in the IR itself? - Akshat
