On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 01:12:33PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 03:04:53PM +0000, Michael Matz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 7 Aug 2019, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> >
> > > => x->is_a (REG)
> >
> > Oh god, please no. Currently at least the RTL parts of GCC still have
> > mostly a consistent and obvious style, which is a good thing. I have no
> > idea why anyone would think the above is easier to read than REG_P (x).
> >
> >
> > Ciao,
> > Michael.
> > P.S: Consider this: the current style served us quite well for the last 35
> > or so years, so before suggesting style changes, shouldn't you first work
> > on the sources for some time?
>
> Well, the main point of the email was to ask for review of a patchset
> that attempts to make progress on a TODO that has been outstanding for
> at least 15 of those 35 years.
Not everything that is in some TODO list somewhere is something generally
agreed upon.
Jakub
