On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:14:22AM -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > On 2019-08-19 3:35 a.m., John Darrington wrote: > >On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:50:13AM -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > > No I meant something like that > > > > (define_special_memory_constraint "a" ...) > > (define_predicate "my_special_predicate" ... > > > > { > > if (lra_in_progress_p) > > return REG_P (op) && REGNO (op) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER && > > reg_renumber[REGNO(op)] < 0; > > return true if memory with sp addressing; > > }) > > > > I think LRA spills pseudo-register and it will be memory addressed > > by sp > > at the end of LRA. > > > >What I've done is this: > > > >(define_predicate "my_special_predicate" > > (match_operand 0 "memory_operand") > > { > > debug_rtx (op); > > gcc_assert (MEM_P (op)); > > op = XEXP (op, 0); > > if (GET_CODE (op) == PLUS) > > op = XEXP (op, 0); > > > > if (lra_in_progress) > > { > > fprintf (stderr, "%s:%d\n", __FILE__, __LINE__); > > return REG_P (op) && REGNO (op) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER && > > reg_renumber[REGNO(op)] < 0; > > } > > > > > > if (REG_P (op)) > > { > > int regno = REGNO (op); > > return (regno == 10); // register is the stack pointer > > } > > > > return true; > > }) > > > > (and many variations) Unfortunately, any moderately complicated input > > still results in a (mem (reg) ) insn repeatedly entering the > > lra_in_progress case and returning false, and eventually terminating with > > > > "internal compiler error: maximum number of generated reload insns per > > insn achieved (90)" > > > > > >Any other ideas? > As I remember there were a few other ideas from Richard Biener and > Segher Boessenkool. I also proposed to add a new address register which > will be always a fixed stack memory slot at the end. Unfortunately I am > not familiar with the target and the port to say in details how to do > it. But I think it is worth to try.
The m68hc11 port used the fake Z register approach, and I believe it had some special machine pass to get rid of it right before assembler output. (r171302 is when it was removed -- last version was https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=gcc/config/m68hc11/m68hc11.c;h=1e414102c3f1fed985e4fb8db7954342e965190b;hb=bae8bb65d842d7ffefe990c1f0ac004491f3c105#l4061 for the machine reorg stuff). No idea how well it works... But it's only needed if you are forced to have a frame pointer IIUC? Segher