On Mon, 2019-08-19 at 17:05 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > There's a real good chance Martin Liska has already fixed this. He's > made a couple fixes in the last week or so with the interactions > between > the GC system and the symbol tables. > > > 2019-08-15 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz> > > PR ipa/91404 > * passes.c (order): Remove. > (uid_hash_t): Likewise). > (remove_cgraph_node_from_order): Remove from set > of pointers (cgraph_node *). > (insert_cgraph_node_to_order): New. > (duplicate_cgraph_node_to_order): New. > (do_per_function_toporder): Register all 3 cgraph hooks. > Skip removed_nodes now as we know about all of them. > > > The way I'd approach would be to configure a compiler with > --enable-checking=gc,gcac, just build it through stage1. Then run your > test through that compiler which should fail. THen apply Martin's patch > (or update to the head of the trunk), rebuild the stage1 compiler and > verify it works.
I had already built a compiler with --enable-checking=gc,gcac, that did not catch the bug (I still got a segfault). I did update my sources though and the bug does not happen at ToT so it looks like Martin's patch did fix my bug. Steve Ellcey sell...@marvell.com
