On Apr 06 2020, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote: > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 10:46:34AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: >> On 4/6/20 10:37 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 10:09:24AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: >> > > On 4/6/20 1:57 AM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: >> > > > Hi - >> > > > >> > > > Courtesy of a lovely httpd RewriteMap-basd hack courtesy of Martin, we >> > > > have all the svn r##### redirects working, and faster than before. >> > > >> > > Great. Thank you application of the RewriteMap! >> > >> > E.g. https://gcc.gnu.org/r105377 or https://gcc.gnu.org/r12345 >> > don't work. >> >> These look not valid by svn-rev: >> >> $ git svn-rev 105377 | wc -l >> 0 >> $ git svn-rev 12345 | wc -l >> 0 > > Dunno about the latter, but the former then looks like a repo conversion > bug: > https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-cvs/2005-10/msg01053.html > (that is the first commit to svn after cvs conversion).
This is strange. Accoding to "svn diff -c 105377 svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc" this is a revision on branches/libstdcxx_so_7-branch. There is also a gap between r105390 and r105927 on the gcc-cvs archive, where the latter is the first revision that agrees with the online repository. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."
