Hi all,

In PR51505(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51505), Paolo Bonzini 
added the code to delete REG_EQUAL notes in df_remove_dead_eq_notes:

gcc/df-problems.c:
df_remove_dead_eq_notes (rtx_insn *insn, bitmap live)
{
...
        case REG_EQUAL:
        case REG_EQUIV:
          {
            /* Remove the notes that refer to dead registers.  As we have at 
most
               one REG_EQUAL/EQUIV note, all of EQ_USES will refer to this note
               so we need to purge the complete EQ_USES vector when removing
               the note using df_notes_rescan.  */
            df_ref use;
            bool deleted = false;

            FOR_EACH_INSN_EQ_USE (use, insn)
              if (DF_REF_REGNO (use) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER
                  && DF_REF_LOC (use)
                  && (DF_REF_FLAGS (use) & DF_REF_IN_NOTE)
                  && !bitmap_bit_p (live, DF_REF_REGNO (use))
                  && loc_mentioned_in_p (DF_REF_LOC (use), XEXP (link, 0)))
                {
                  deleted = true;
                  break;
                }
            if (deleted)
              {
                rtx next;
                if (REG_DEAD_DEBUGGING)
                  df_print_note ("deleting: ", insn, link);
                next = XEXP (link, 1);
                free_EXPR_LIST_node (link);
                *pprev = link = next;
                df_notes_rescan (insn);
              }
...
}


while I have a test case as below:


typedef long myint_t;
__attribute__ ((noinline)) myint_t
hash_loop (myint_t nblocks, myint_t hash)
{
    int i;
    for (i = 0; i < nblocks; i++)
      hash = ((hash + 13) | hash) + 0x66546b64;
    return hash;
}

before cse1:

   22: L22:
   16: NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK 4
   17: r125:DI=r120:DI+0xd
   18: r118:DI=r125:DI|r120:DI
   19: r126:DI=r118:DI+0x66540000
   20: r120:DI=r126:DI+0x6b64
      REG_EQUAL r118:DI+0x66546b64
   21: r119:DI=r119:DI-0x1
   23: r127:CC=cmp(r119:DI,0)
   24: pc={(r127:CC!=0)?L22:pc}
      REG_BR_PROB 955630228

The dump in cse1:

   16: NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK 4
   17: r125:DI=r120:DI+0xd
   18: r118:DI=r125:DI|r120:DI
      REG_DEAD r125:DI
      REG_DEAD r120:DI
   19: r126:DI=r118:DI+0x66540000
      REG_DEAD r118:DI
   20: r120:DI=r126:DI+0x6b64
      REG_DEAD r126:DI
   21: r119:DI=r119:DI-0x1
   23: r127:CC=cmp(r119:DI,0)
   24: pc={(r127:CC!=0)?L22:pc}
      REG_DEAD r127:CC
      REG_BR_PROB 955630228
      ; pc falls through to BB 6


The output shows "REQ_EQUAL r118:DI+0x66546b64" is deleted by 
df_remove_dead_eq_notes,
but r120:DI is not REG_DEAD here, so is it correct here to check insn use and 
find that
r118:DI is dead then do the delete?


Thanks,
Xionghu

Reply via email to