On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 3:11 AM Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> XXX: I've only verified the below actually compiles, I've not verified
> the generated code is actually 'correct'.
Well, it was mainly the arm64 code generation for load-acquire and
store-release that wanted this - so it's really the generated code
that matters.
Will, can you check?
Because:
> +#define __unqual_typeof(type) typeof( (typeof(type))type )
that's certainly a much nicer version than the existing pre-processor
expansion from hell.
Linus
