On Thu, Sep 16, 2021, 4:50 PM enh via Libc-alpha <libc-al...@sourceware.org> wrote:
> plus testing for _equality_ can (as mentioned earlier) have slightly > different properties from the three-way comparator behavior of > bcmp()/memcmp(). > How does bcmp() have a three-way comparator? Or do you mean how it is currently implemented as an alias to memcmp()? > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:43 PM Joseph Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> > wrote: > > > On Thu, 16 Sep 2021, James Y Knight wrote: > > > > > Wouldn't it be far simpler to just un-deprecate bcmp? > > > > The aim is to have something to which calls can be generated in all > > standards modes. bcmp has never been part of ISO C; there's nothing to > > undeprecate there. > > > > -- > > Joseph S. Myers > > jos...@codesourcery.com > > >
