On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 14:00 +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: [] > Changes in v3: > Revert suggested change in v2, for kernel test robot <l...@intel.com> found > > warning: Function parameter or member 'flush_workqueue' not described in > 'void' > warning: expecting prototype for flush_workqueue(). Prototype was for > void() instead > > when built with W=1 option.
Odd, perhaps that not a valid error message and is a defect in gcc's parsing of function definitions. > Changes in v2: > Use "void (flush_workqueue)(struct workqueue_struct *wq)" and remove > "#undef flush_workqueue", suggested by Joe Perches <j...@perches.com>.
