> A Certification Mark is the proper way to formally and legally enforce such > requirements.
BTW, nobody is or was at all confident that the Ada mark was legally enforcable. I'm in the camp that it isn't. > telling people they cannot patch the source code without permission Nobody is telling people that. What they're saying is the same thing as the GPL does: it you distribute modified code, you need to be clear that what you're distributing is a modification.
