On Thu, 1 Sep 2022, FX via Gcc wrote: > A tentative patch is attached, it seems to work well on simple examples, > but for test coverage the hard part is going to be that the comparisons > seem to be optimised away very easily into their non-signaling versions. > Basically, if I do:
Presumably that can be reproduced without depending on the new built-in function? In which case it's an existing bug somewhere in the optimizers. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
