On Thu, 3 Nov 2022, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote: > My main worry is that both Clang and GCC still enable implicit ints by > default. This means that auto variables have type int always, and that > can subtly alter the meaning of programs. The only indication that this > has happened in a code base is a warning that went away (!). I don't > like that.
My expectation is that the old use of auto as a storage class specifier is actually very rare in C code, so this particular sub-case (auto with no type specifier meaning implicit int) is even rarer and there isn't much porting to be done for it (unlike for the rest of implicit int). -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
