On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 16:18:00 +0000, Iain Sandoe wrote: > I think it is reasonable to include c++ in the spelling, since other > languages supported by > GCC (and clang in due course) have modules.
Especially given that Fortran doesn't necessarily have one module to output; Fortran sources can contain many such modules (though they tend to be looked up via include paths, so they are actually implicit builds today; that may change if/when Fortran adopts P1689 as well). --Ben
