Brad King wrote: > Roman Yakovenko wrote: >> if you ask me, I would revert last commit. The >> previous situation was deterministic: only declarations, defined by >> the users, were dumped. Now, I cannot even reliably apply my >> "guesses". > > In that case how do you propose to fix this bug: > > http://www.gccxml.org/Bug/view.php?id=7148 > > ? This is a case where your old guesses would be wrong, I think.
Can you work with the current version if you ignore declarations marked "artificial"? Remember that before the GCC 4.2 upgrade the artificial copy constructor *did* show up. -Brad _______________________________________________ gccxml mailing list [email protected] http://www.gccxml.org/mailman/listinfo/gccxml
