Brad King wrote: > For now I've removed the change and re-opened the original bug: > > http://www.gccxml.org/Bug/view.php?id=7148 > > I'll have to find a better place to get the implicit declarations done > before the dump.
I've committed another fix for that bug that puts all the implicit declarations in again. This time I think I'm doing it in a safe place. You should now be able to depend completely on the presence/lack of these members. BTW, the is_default_constructible stuff is not immediately available AFAICS, so I've dropped that front in favor of this fix. -Brad _______________________________________________ gccxml mailing list [email protected] http://www.gccxml.org/mailman/listinfo/gccxml
