On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Brad King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sagrailo wrote: > > Is there any particular reason why the release of this project cannot be > > made from back in 2004? > > No, we simply have not gotten around to doing one. Releases are time > consuming.
I understand; please at least count a vote for have a release sometimes: it is easier indeed to create a package when official tarball is available for download, and then there are other advantages from the user point of view, for example CVS serving is rather slow - it took me more than hour to get the whole gccxml tree from the CVS last evening, while when I created tarball it was ~17MB, which I would have downloaded in couple minutes if served through HTTP, FTP or something alike... Related question: is there a chance to have gccxml merged into the gcc source tree (as some kind of back-end, I guess) at some point? Thanks.
_______________________________________________ gccxml mailing list [email protected] http://www.gccxml.org/mailman/listinfo/gccxml
