On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Brad King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sagrailo wrote: >> Related question: is there a chance to have gccxml merged into the gcc >> source tree (as some kind of back-end, I guess) at some point? > > There are two parts to gccxml. > > 1.) The patched GCC parser to perform the dump > 2.) The front-end which simulates native compilers > > I cannot say for sure that #1 will never be in gcc upstream,
Did you you see the following discussion: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-09/msg00292.html May be "never" can be transform to something else :-) > but #2 will > not. The #2 part has a whole bunch of compatibility patches for system > headers of native compilers from many different vendors. It allows the > GCC compiler to read the system header files from these other compilers. > This is needed so that the dumped interface exactly matches what the > user's compiler would see. Are there some changes to the GCC itself, or this is just a set of patched header files? -- Roman Yakovenko C++ Python language binding http://www.language-binding.net/ _______________________________________________ gccxml mailing list [email protected] http://www.gccxml.org/mailman/listinfo/gccxml
