Subtle bug in GCL (low priority). What should this form read as? `#5(1 ,@`(2 3))
ECL, LispWorks and fare-quasiquote agree on #(1 2 3 2 3) allegro, ccl, clisp, sbcl return the arguably conformant #(1 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3) abcl, cmucl, gcl, xcl all return the arguably completely buggy #(1 2 3) —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org It may be bad manners to talk with your mouth full, but it isn't too good either if you speak when your head is empty. _______________________________________________ Gcl-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
