On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Faré <[email protected]> wrote: > Subtle bug in CMUCL. > > What should this form read as? > `#5(1 ,@`(2 3)) > > ECL, LispWorks and fare-quasiquote agree on #(1 2 3 2 3) Sorry, as PJB points out on the armedbear-devel list, the correct answer, that I failed to copy/paste correctly, is #(1 2 3 3 3) indeed.
> allegro, ccl, clisp, sbcl return the arguably conformant #(1 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3) > abcl, cmucl, gcl, xcl all return the arguably completely buggy #(1 2 3) PJB also argues that the CLHS can be argued to not have specified `#n(...) in which case, using it is non-conformant and returning #(1 2 3), erroring out, or launching a nuclear attack are all valid implementations. —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org The Philosophy of Liberty, or Libertarianism, is a theory of Law; it is an ethics of Liberty and Responsibility; it is a cybernetics of Human Action; it is the only authentically subversive ideology. _______________________________________________ Gcl-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
