Greetings! The GC and memory bounds control in both systems is identical. The 2.7 compiler is doing much more and the bootstrap as previously explained is currently needlessly slow. But to the extent you see the [GC ] messages indicating the garbage collection code is being triggered, the memory bounds should be comparable to somewhat larger in 2.7 unless something else is going wrong.
I will see if I can compare figures on Debian autobuilders. On my personal machine, compiling the 2.6 Debian package with all 4 images took about 20min. 2.7 clocked in at 90. Take care, "Kirill A. Korinsky" <kir...@korins.ky> writes: > Hello, > > On 24. Dec 2023, at 15:55, Camm Maguire <c...@maguirefamily.org> wrote: > > BTW the memory consumption issues should be identical to 2.6. Please > let me know if your mileage varies. > > 2.6.14 builds on the same machine via same MacPorts with near the same > patches without any issue. Much faster and consumes neigleble amount of > memory. -- Camm Maguire c...@maguirefamily.org ========================================================================== "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
