On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 11:32 -0700, Christopher Barker wrote: > > "Luke Roth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > >> wxWidgets for the GUI. While I'm developing in Windows, the only > >> dependencies so far are wxWidgets and GDAL, so it should cross-compile > >> on Linux pretty easily. As for the target imagery, I'm looking at > >> pretty large aerial and satellite images (DOQQs, MODIS tiles), which > > Did you take a look at OSSIM? At some point in the past, they were > wx-based, though I don't know what they are up to now.
It seams like they switched to qt. I know it is possible to find a lot of references on the web where wx, qt, gtk, even Tcl/TK are compared. But I am wondering if there is some Geospatial reason to pick qt instead of wx. > Have you considered wxPython? It may be that your core image processing > would need some C/C++, but there is no reason that the whole GUI has to > be written in C++ (at at least no performance reason). wxPython is awesome. I wich they where around 10 years when I used Tcl/TK on a project, a diagram editor for map algebra. That project could be alive until today. :( Some time I wish that OpenEv could use wxPython instead of python+TK. I like OpenEv and I use it a lot, but it is hard to introduce it to end users. "wx" produce much better results in term of adapting to the look and feel of the hosting platform than Tk. > That would be great. If you have a component that can deal with images > loaded with GDAL, and convert them to wxBitmaps or wxImages, or... I"d > be very interested. Particularly if those components were (or could be ) > wrapped for wxPython. I completely agree with Chris. Ivan _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
