Christopher Condit wrote:
See http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2461 for information about this...
I can only confirm with what is stated at the end of this page: > We should attempt to preserve the original precision by default, > and potentially offer an option to reduce the precision.
I think you can use the nlt option to at least make the input 2.5 D and then strip the Z value off, effectively removing the height. It may be related to the CS transformation but I'm not sure without seeing your actual input file.
Thanks for the hint. I will give it a try. For an input file, you could take any shapefile at: http://tinyurl.com/c56uch
Hermann _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
