Norman, I don't think the way you have created your sandbox is going to be efficient to track and review the changes. It appears you have done an *import* of a *modified* GDAL tree.
I think it would have been better to do that in several steps : - delete the content of your sandbox in SVN - create a branch of an unmodified GDAL tree into your sandbox: svn cp http://svn.osgeo.org/gdal/trunk/gdal http://svn.osgeo.org/gdal/sandbox/normanb - checkout your sandbox in a working copy : svn co http://svn.osgeo.org/gdal/sandbox/normanb - apply your changes to your working copy and commit them. That way we'll be able to review the changes. And it will make a future merge to trunk a lot easier. Even Le Friday 17 April 2009 18:59:09 Norman Barker, vous avez écrit : > Hi, > > I have put the JPIPKAK prototype code in > > http://svn.osgeo.org/gdal/sandbox/normanb/ > > and the original RFC is at > > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc24_progressive_data_support > > I have pruned the formats in this sandbox since I had a lot of problems > uploading to SVN. > > Comments appreciated. > > Norman _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
