How about gdaldem2image for a name? A little long, but less confusion over
what it actually does...
Matt Wilkie wrote:
Upon reflection, I think we should congregate these utilities into a
single utility -- gdaldem (I'm totally flexible on the name -- and
have each be a separate operation within that rather than
proliferating five more GDAL utilities.
-- http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2640
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
