Dear GDAL, Any thoughts on whether the best read/write performance vs disk space used is achieved through file system compression or in-raster compression? The former would be via Windows NTFS compact and the latter via TIFF LZW or perhaps JP2.
thanks, -matt -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Compress-via-NTFS-or-in-image-for-performance-tp3491435p3491435.html Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
