Hi, I've committed a fix (r19493) that will disable the use of the new GDALCopyWords implementation. The old and new implementations are functionally equivalent, but the new implementation is in some cases 5-10x faster than the old implementation. However, there is no problem with disabling it and affecting the functionality of GDAL.
For future reference, if you hit a bug in GDAL, one of the best ways to get developer attention is to file a bug report on the GDAL Trac website (http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/newticket), but this first requires creating an OSGeo account at http://www.osgeo.org/osgeo_userid. Cheers, Philippe On 2010-04-20, at 4:34 PM, jcurru wrote: > > Thanks for your answer, Philippe. > I could make rasterio.cpp compile by making the following change (line 38): > > // For now, work around MSVC++ 6.0's broken template support. If this value > // is not defined, the old GDALCopyWords implementation is used. > #define USE_NEW_COPYWORDS 1 > #endif > #undef USE_NEW_COPYWORDS // changed > > I guess gdal will use some kind of former strategie to copy bytes. > I hope this will generate valid code. > > But you are telling me to "file a ticket on GDAL's trac > (http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal) and assign it to me (pvachon)." Due to my poor > english and lack of experience in this forum, I unfortunately don't know > what you mean. Would you be so kind to explain it to me? > > Thanks again. > -- > View this message in context: > http://n2.nabble.com/Compiling-in-Embarcadero-s-CBuilder-tp4930084p4933551.html > Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
