On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Even Rouault <even.roua...@mines-paris.org> wrote: > Selon Jean-Claude Repetto <jrepe...@free.fr>: > >> Le 22/12/2010 14:57, Even Rouault a écrit : >> >> > I'm not so sure there are many low-hanging fruits. The size of a patch >> isn't >> > necessary a proof of its correctness ;-) Perhaps you could help us and >> indicate >> > what tickets you believe to be appropriate for quick closing/patching ? >> > >> >> This is an example, at random : http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2664 > > Hum, this ticket is a bit complicated from a process point of view. It > involves > mostly a change in libgeotiff. So only Frank can act on this one.
Jean-Claude, I do not like to extend the projection method list for GeoTIFF format without careful consideration and documentation. In fact, it ought to only be done by a process of agreement of the geotiff community. So, I don't consider this an easy change at all. Best regards, -- ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmer...@pobox.com light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Programmer for Rent _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev