Rahkonen Jukka <Jukka.Rahkonen <at> mmmtike.fi> writes: > > Even Rouault wrote: > > >> EPSG:3067 and > >> 25835 are just the same ETRS89 / UTM zone 35N but the latter is officially > >> Northing-Easting. > > > Hum, GDAL (as reported by "gdalsrsinfo EPSG:25835") sees both as Easting- > > Northing ordered. What is your reference for EPSG:25835 being ordered as > > Northing-Easting ? > > Right, EPSG:25835 is Easting-Northing. I was naturally meaning either EPSG:3047 or EPSG:5048 which are > both Northing-Easting and presenting ETRS89 / UTM zone 35N. Very enjoyable.
I already thought that I could get a valid shapefile with ogr2ogr by replacing EPSG:3067 with EPSG:3047 everywhere in the XML document. However, ogr2ogr was creating a similar flipped shapefile. Is this a gdal bug? EPSG:3047 is definitely Northing-Easting http://www.epsg-registry.org/report.htm?type=selection&entity=urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::3047&reportDetail=short&style=urn:uuid:report-style:default-with-urn&style_name=OGP%20Default%20With%20Urn&title=3047 Gdal 1.8.1 does not know EPSG:5048 yet. -Jukka- _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev