Hi Konstantin, As far as I remember, I'd require some further testing efforts to make sure the code is feasible in all conditions. This RFC targets a fairly substantial part of the code, that should be handled with care. But the client who required this fix (with the intent to fix problems addressing TMS tiles at large zoom levels) went ahead with another solution to the problem, so this addition has become quite neglected.
Did you run into a similar issue, which would also validate this change? Best regards, Tamas 2012/11/1 Konstantin Baumann <konstantin.baum...@autodesk.com> > Hi all, > > what is the current state of the adoption and implementation of RFC #26 ( > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc26_blockcache)? Are there any plans to > finalize the development for it? > > -Konstantin > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
