Hi, 2012/10/26 Martin Landa <landa.mar...@gmail.com>: >> However, as your changes only affect your driver, I think it would be >> easier to commit them to 1.9.0 without an RFC. It would be easier if >> you prepare a small wiki page (similar to RFCs) describing the >> changes, and create at least one bug entry. > > I have filled the ticket for this issue [1]. If a wiki page is also > required I will prepare it too. > > Thanks for info in advance. Best regards, Martin > > [1] http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4872
important from my POV is to include the updated VFK driver in 1.9.3. Suggested changes affects only VFK driver. Are there any objections for backporting VFK driver to 1.9 branch? Thanks, Martin -- Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
