Selon Martin Landa <landa.mar...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > 2012/10/26 Martin Landa <landa.mar...@gmail.com>: > >> However, as your changes only affect your driver, I think it would be > >> easier to commit them to 1.9.0 without an RFC. It would be easier if > >> you prepare a small wiki page (similar to RFCs) describing the > >> changes, and create at least one bug entry. > > > > I have filled the ticket for this issue [1]. If a wiki page is also > > required I will prepare it too. > > > > Thanks for info in advance. Best regards, Martin > > > > [1] http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4872 > > important from my POV is to include the updated VFK driver in 1.9.3. > Suggested changes affects only VFK driver. Are there any objections > for backporting VFK driver to 1.9 branch?
Martin, I don't have objections. My only fear is that the addition of the SQLite dependency in the VFK driver would cause compilation problems in some setups/platforms that would have an ancient SQLite version for example. But as we have already the SQLite dependency in the GML driver, provided you don't use too recent sqlite3_XXX functions (and a quick grep does not show anything exotic indeed), this should be OK. Did you also test that the compilation is OK for people who configure GDAL without the sqlite dependency ? Even _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev