Am 07.11.2013 16:39, schrieb
b.j.kob...@utwente.nl:
As an added note: be aware that 102092 is NOT an actual EPSG code. EPSG
codes with no's> 32768 are not in the official EPSG database, and are in
actual fact therefore not EPSG codes really.
It is actually a definition by ESRI:
<http://spatialreference.org/ref/esri/102092/>
and we all know that they keep datum shifts always seperately from
projection definitions.
I don't understand why QGIS 2.0 (and GDAL 1.10.0) simply calls them EPSG.
QGIS 1.8.0 Lisboa did not know those codes, and they named French
definitions IGNF:...
I would like to see those ESRI definitions marked ESRI:... to flag the
difference.
** added mailing lists for proj.4 and gdal as it comes probably from there
Greetings,
André Joost
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
