On 28 November 2013 11:03, Mateusz Loskot <mate...@loskot.net> wrote:
> On 28 November 2013 09:51, Rui L. Pires <rlpi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > Is there any interest in having LAS as one of the OGR supported formats? > > It's been discussed: > > http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2011-April/028439.html > Fair enough. > > Would there be any particular reason for not supporting it? > > Point cloud is not a vector, not a raster either? :-) > That might be debatable, but it won't be me reopening that discussion. Having said that, if you could assure me that all formats supported in http://www.gdal.org/ogr/ogr_formats.html are vector formats, I would have understood your point (of not offering a LAS driver). Regards, Rui On 28 November 2013 11:03, Mateusz Loskot <mate...@loskot.net> wrote: > On 28 November 2013 09:51, Rui L. Pires <rlpi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > Is there any interest in having LAS as one of the OGR supported formats? > > It's been discussed: > > http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2011-April/028439.html > > > Would there be any particular reason for not supporting it? > > Point cloud is not a vector, not a raster either? :-) > > Best regards, > -- > Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev