> > > QGIS is usually just calls to gdal, which makes this even more mysterious. >
Yes, in the end it uses gdal, but it chooses the way blocks are read and written. If I remember correctly geotiff final sizes may depend on block ordering and memory alignment. Maybe this is the case, QGIS raster provider not doing the best at this level? Don't know, but this discussion is for the QGIS ml ;) giovanni > > On 7/5/2014 9:09 AM, G. Allegri wrote: > > I agree with you David, I'm surprised too. > > Anyway, gdal_translate is run without compression options. > > I've written to the QGIS devs (it was the software) to verify what's > > happening with its raster file writer code... > > > > -- Giovanni Allegri http://about.me/giovanniallegri Twitter: https://twitter.com/_giohappy_ blog: http://blog.spaziogis.it GEO+ geomatica in Italia http://bit.ly/GEOplus
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
