Even Rouault <even.rouault <at> spatialys.com> writes:
> > I'm wondering if it might not make more sense to modify the input driver(s) to > not report out-of-range nodata values ? I fail to see a reason to report an > out-of-range nodata value. I wonder what happens for the nodata value if we convert images with GDAL into types with more narrow range (32-bit -> 16-bit -> byte). Can the out-of-range nodata values be our own creatures sometimes or do we handle the case perfectly? -Jukka Rahkonen- _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev