Hi Even, hi William,
I have just opened a new PR on github (https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/68).
It should restore the old behavior if the standard system interpreted is used 
on OSX.
It should also work with homebrew etc. that uses the classic unix schema for 
python packages installation.

Please let me know if it work for you.


cheers

--
Antonio Valentino



> Il giorno 20/set/2015, alle ore 18:02, William Kyngesburye 
> <wokl...@kyngchaos.com> ha scritto:
> 
> I tried the bit there that gets the python path (get_python_lb), and it works 
> to get the OS X user path if there is no arg, ie get_python_lib().
> 
> For OS X is that the python user path is independent of the installation 
> prefix.
> 
> For the logic, one basic method in a makefile I can think of for detecting OS 
> X is to check uname for Darwin.  Note that the python path is also 
> independent on whether an OS X framework (MACOSX_FRAMEWORK) or unix library 
> is built, so don't use MACOSX_FRAMEWORK to test for OS X.
> 
> On Sep 20, 2015, at 10:33 AM, Even Rouault <even.roua...@spatialys.com> wrote:
> 
>> Le dimanche 20 septembre 2015 17:24:18, William Kyngesburye a écrit :
>>> /Library/Python/[version]/site-packages is the standard user path for OS X.
>>> /usr/lib is not in the python path.  Even if you add /usr/lib to the
>>> Travis setup, the installation will still be broken for general use.
>> 
>> ok, thanks for the feedback William. So I guess we have to figure how to 
>> revert
>> to the old behaviour on OS X then ? Any idea ? The changeset is
>> https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/changeset/30564
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sep 20, 2015, at 10:09 AM, Even Rouault <even.roua...@spatialys.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Antonio has contributed a fix in https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4563
>>>> to make the Python bindings honour the installation prefix.
>>>> 
>>>> A side effect of this is that now on the MacOsX Travis instance, they are
>>>> installed in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages whereas previously they
>>>> were installed in /Library/Python/2.7/site-packages
>>>> But it appears that they are not found automatically when in
>>>> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages. Is it expected ? Should we define
>>>> PYTHONPATH to /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages in thre Travis script (
>>>> https://github.com/rouault/gdal_coverage/blob/trunk_travis_macosx/.travis
>>>> .yml )
>>>> 
>>>> Before change:
>>>> https://travis-ci.org/rouault/gdal_coverage/builds/81193480 New
>>>> behaviour: ​https://travis-ci.org/rouault/gdal_coverage/builds/81242249
>>>> 
>>>> Even
>>> 
>>> -----
>>> William Kyngesburye <kyngchaos*at*kyngchaos*dot*com>
>>> http://www.kyngchaos.com/
>>> 
>>> First Pogril: Why is life like sticking your head in a bucket filled with
>>> hyena offal? Second Pogril: I don't know.  Why IS life like sticking your
>>> head in a bucket filled with hyena offal? First Pogril: I don't know
>>> either.  Wretched, isn't it?
>>> 
>>> -HitchHiker's Guide to the Galaxy
>> 
>> --
>> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
>> http://www.spatialys.com
> 
> -----
> William Kyngesburye <kyngchaos*at*kyngchaos*dot*com>
> http://www.kyngchaos.com/
> 
> "I ache, therefore I am.  Or in my case - I am, therefore I ache."
> 
> - Marvin
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to