On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Even Rouault <even.roua...@spatialys.com> wrote:
> Hi Sean, > > > > I see something that looks like a regression between the beta and rc3 in > my > > Rasterio CI > > > > https://travis-ci.org/mapbox/rasterio/jobs/125120910#L1429 > > > > That test was passing with the beta release. Any chance of holding the > > release up for 60 minutes while I double check that I'm just not building > > 2.1.0 wrong on Travis? > > Sure, take the needed time. > > Is this test about catching GDAL debug messages ? There was a change in > GDAL > logging just before beta1 related to that (and normally with little impact > in > the default behaviour), so if that worked with beta1, no reason that > doesn't > work anymore. I'm short of idea otherwise. > Can you point me to the commit changing the logging? I might be confused about whether I'm comparing rc3 behavior to beta1 or an earlier snapshot. There's definitely a change since April 1's dev prerelease. -- Sean Gillies
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
