+1 I couldn't come up with anything better, and I was mostly lamenting the need to add more to the API surface.
Howard > On Oct 5, 2016, at 5:53 AM, Tamas Szekeres <szeker...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 > > Tamas > > > > 2016-10-05 12:44 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault <even.roua...@spatialys.com>: > Hi, > > I know that Howard has expressed some concerns regarding the potential > confusion that this could add, but I'm not sure what better alternatives there > would be to address the needs it tries to solve. > > So I move to adopt RFC 66: OGR random layer read/write capabilities > > https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc66_randomlayerreadwrite > > ------- > > Starting with my +1 > > Even > > -- > Spatialys - Geospatial professional services > http://www.spatialys.com > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
